Objective: The aim of the present study was to make a clinical comparison of bracket position accuracy and failure rate between direct and indirect bonding techniques. Subjects and methods: Thirty patients were selected. Patients divided into two groups according to the technique, each group consist of 15 patients. Group A included the patients that treated with direct bonding technique. Group B included the patients that treated with indirect bonding technique. Check-up was carried out every 3 weeks and a special sheet was used to record the failure rate of the brackets. Results: 294 brackets were bonded in a group A (direct technique), and only 39 brackets were debonded. 290 brackets were bonded in a group B (indirect technique), and only 47 brackets were debonded. Conclusion: Generally, there is not clinically significance in the failure rate between direct and indirect bonding techniques.
(2020). A Comparison of Bracket Failure Rate Between Direct and Indirect Bonding Techniques: A Prospective Clinical Study. Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science, 23(1), 79-86. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2020.108468
MLA
. "A Comparison of Bracket Failure Rate Between Direct and Indirect Bonding Techniques: A Prospective Clinical Study", Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science, 23, 1, 2020, 79-86. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2020.108468
HARVARD
(2020). 'A Comparison of Bracket Failure Rate Between Direct and Indirect Bonding Techniques: A Prospective Clinical Study', Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science, 23(1), pp. 79-86. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2020.108468
VANCOUVER
A Comparison of Bracket Failure Rate Between Direct and Indirect Bonding Techniques: A Prospective Clinical Study. Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science, 2020; 23(1): 79-86. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2020.108468