Evaluation of Zirconia Infused Glass Ionomer Cement Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class II Restorations of Primary Molars

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Pedodontics and Oral Health Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Cairo. Al-Azhar University

2 Pedodontics and Oral Health Department Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Cairo Al-Azhar University.

3 Lecturer of Pedodontics and Oral Health Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Cairo Al-Azhar University

4 Dental Bio-materials department Faculty of Dental Medicine Boys, Cairo Al-Azhar University

Abstract

Objective of this study to was to evaluate zirconia infused glass ionomer cement versus resin modified glass ionomer in class II restorations of primary molars.
Materials & Methods: This study was classified in to vivo and vitro study. I- vivo study: 18 posterior primary molars from 9 children by using split mouth technique was classified equally in to two groups. Group 1: 9 deciduous molars were restored with resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI) filling. Group 2: 9 deciduous molars were restored with zirconia infused glass-ionomer (ZRGI) filling. Follow up using the FDI criteria to evaluate the clinical performance of both materials. II- vitro study: 18 freshly extracted human deciduous molars with no crack, decay or structure deformities were collected and stored in normal saline. Group 3: 9 extracted deciduous molars were restored with resin-modified glass-ionomer filling. Group 4: 9 extracted deciduous molars were restored with zirconia- infused glass-ionomer filling. The measures were calculated by Shear bond strength and Wear resistance calculation. Results: It was found that that RMGI is better in shear strength than zirconia infused glass ionomer, while the two materials have the same resistance to wear. Conclusion: Shear Bond strength of RMGI is better than zirconomer. There is no significant difference in wear resistance between the two materials. Clinical performance of RMGI is better than zirconomer.

Keywords

Main Subjects