Evaluation For Elastic Modulus Of CAD-CAM Milled And 3D Printed Denture Base Resins

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Badr University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Badr city, Cairo.

2 Department of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Cairo, Al-Azhar University

3 Department of Removable prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Cairo, Al-Azhar University

Abstract

Objective: to compare the elastic modulus between milled, 3D printed and conventional compression moulded denture base resins (DBRs). Materials and methods: Three different types of DBRs were used, 1st one; milled resin (pre-polymerized PMMA plates), 2nd one; 3D printed resin (photopolymerized resin), 3rd one; polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) heat cured resin (powder-liquid system). 30 specimens have been constructed with specific dimensions (65mm x10mm x3mm) and divided into 3 groups (10 for each group) according to the type of DBR, Group I contained the milled DBR specimens, Group II contained 3-dimentional printed DBR specimens, and Group III contained conventional compression moulded DBR specimens. The elastic modulus of the 30 specimens were measured and calculated by universal testing machine using three-point loading test. Data were calculated and analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and Tukey’s pair-wise post hoc tests. Results: The elastic modulus of the milled group was significantly higher than that of the other 2 groups (P<0.05), while the elastic modulus of the compression moulded group was significantly greater than that of the 3D printed group (P<0.05). Conclusion: milled DBR show the highest elastic modulus when compared with conventional compression moulded or 3D printed DBRs, while 3D printed DBR shows the lowest elastic modulus.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Volume 25, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
July - Restorative Dentistry Issue (Removable Prosthodontics, Fixed Prosthodontics, Endodontics, Dental Biomaterials, Operative Dentistry)
July 2022
Pages 241-246