Evaluation of translucency and strength of two glass ceramics after different surface treatments

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine. Future University in Egypt

2 Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

3 Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength and translucency of two different glass ceramics. Materials and Methods: Sixty disc-shaped specimens (10 mm x 0.3 mm) were divided into two groups (n=30) according to the type of the ceramic material; lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS E.max CAD), and leucite reinforced ceramic (IPS Empress CAD). Each group was divided into three subgroups (n=10) according to the surface treatment applied; whether hydrofluoric acid etching, sandblasting, or no treatment. Translucency Parameter was measured over black and white backgrounds using dental spectrophotometer VITA Easyshade Compact, while bi-axial flexural strength was measured using a ball on ring fixture test. Data was statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc analysis (α = 0.05). Results: There was a significant difference (P <0.05) in translucency parameter between all surface treatments used for IPS E.max CAD groups, while for IPS Empress CAD there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in translucency between both the control and hydrofluoric acid groups as well as between hydrofluoric acid and sandblasted groups. There was no significant difference in bi-axial flexural strength between different types of surface treatments used for IPS E.max CAD. IPS Empress CAD groups showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) only between the control and the hydrofluoric acid groups. Conclusions: IPS E.max CAD had higher translucency and biaxial flexural strength. Different surface treatments used affected the flexural strength and translucency negatively in both materials used.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Volume 25, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
October - Restorative Dentistry Issue (Removable Prosthodontics, Fixed Prosthodontics, Endodontics, Dental Biomaterials, Operative Dentistry)
October 2022
Pages 383-389